Which policy would be most appropriate for an environment with severe restrictions and minimal external connectivity?

• A. Paranoid Policy
• B. Promiscuous Policy
• C. Prudent Policy
• D. Remote-Access Policy

Answer: (C)

When an environment has severe restrictions and minimal external connectivity, the policy should emphasize a cautious, conservative approach to access and exposure. A prudent policy embodies this mindset by enforcing default denial and least-privilege access, allowing only what is truly necessary, restricting outbound connections to essential services, and maintaining tight oversight through auditing and regular reviews. This balance keeps security tight without rendering the environment impractical to operate.

The other options describe extremes or different focuses: a paranoid-style approach would be even more restrictive but often unworkable in practice; a promiscuous policy would loosen controls and expand exposure, opposite of what’s needed; a remote-access policy centers on how remote connections are handled rather than the overall level of connectivity, which isn’t the primary fit for a severely restricted setup.