Which rootkit is described as a hardware or firmware rootkit that can evade code integrity checks?

Prepare for the Certified Ethical Hacker Version 11 Exam. Study with comprehensive questions and explanations. Equip yourself with the skills needed for success!

Multiple Choice

Which rootkit is described as a hardware or firmware rootkit that can evade code integrity checks?

Explanation:
This describes a rootkit that hides outside the operating system, in firmware or hardware. Because code integrity checks typically verify the software and kernel modules loaded by the OS, a rootkit resident in firmware or hardware can operate below that layer and present a clean image to the system. That placement lets it persist across reboots and even some updates, while evading standard integrity protections. In contrast, library-level, boot loader level, or hypervisor-level rootkits live at higher software layers or in the virtualization layer, and while they are stealthy, they don’t inherently bypass firmware/hardware integrity controls in the same way. The hardware/firmware variant is the best fit for evading code integrity checks because it operates outside the scope of those checks. To defend against this, measures like secure boot, firmware/BIOS integrity verification, and hardware-level attestation are essential.

This describes a rootkit that hides outside the operating system, in firmware or hardware. Because code integrity checks typically verify the software and kernel modules loaded by the OS, a rootkit resident in firmware or hardware can operate below that layer and present a clean image to the system. That placement lets it persist across reboots and even some updates, while evading standard integrity protections.

In contrast, library-level, boot loader level, or hypervisor-level rootkits live at higher software layers or in the virtualization layer, and while they are stealthy, they don’t inherently bypass firmware/hardware integrity controls in the same way. The hardware/firmware variant is the best fit for evading code integrity checks because it operates outside the scope of those checks. To defend against this, measures like secure boot, firmware/BIOS integrity verification, and hardware-level attestation are essential.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy